![]() I just played a map with an Axis coalition member that did not use light tanks because he instead used armoured cars. Tactical bombers are uneffective with armored cars. also nerfing armored cars its a indirect nerf to pan-asian so it's complicated Bcuz it's true that I don't need motorized infantry or light to successfully hit the enemy backyard, nerfing their attack will incentivate the use of motorized or light tanks and give to the armored car a special rol of the anti air unit of fast attack groups.īut this should be taken carefully or can derivate into the infiltration technique become inefficient and not just another strategy. ![]() Or maybe even reduce their damage against light and hvy armor overall. Maybe they only need to reduce their attack values but no the defence one in order to made them: "a good option" and not a "must have" unit. Now I'm recapacitating, Yes, maybe they probably need a nerf since they are the only unit you need in order to successfully got in to the enemy base and hit their economy, since they have more air defence than light tanks and motorized, and their attack values are quite effective if you use them as a spearhead. since their are cheap enought and only need 5 levels in comparation to infantry who need 7 for get the same damage values. ![]() Hmmm you made me rethink about this, Im a fan of using a lot of armored cars, I know their weaknesses and how to counter them but I have to admit on a production level and more strategic warfare they are quite strong. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |